Friday, February 28, 2014

DAY 18 (Feb 28) Answering Life's Fundamental Questions

Life is Beautiful


This has been a busy week.

In preparation for your first major assignment we watched Life is Beautiful.  Roberto Benigni directed and co-wrote this film in part from his own personal history of his father being imprisoned in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during WWII.  Benigni won the Oscar for Best Actor, Best Foreign Language Film and Best Dramatic Film Score and his acceptance speeches show him just as he played Guido in the film.

This film has many elements of questions of:
Personhood
Self
Meaning in Life
Supreme Being in it and that's why it is the perfect match for Metaphysics.  

Please review your notes and the blog entries on these four main Metaphysics topics.

Here is some useful information about the film:
Quotes from Life is Beautiful
Questions that arose in Life is Beautiful

Today I distributed your project to bring together all of the ideas in Metaphysics in the Answering Life's Fundamental Questions project that is due next Thursday.

And here's the ALFQ Marking Scheme too.

Enjoy!  As you know I'm flexible with due dates but I really hope you can get this in by next Thursday so that you can relax over March Break.






Monday, February 24, 2014

DAY 14 (Feb 24)  What is the Meaning of Your Life?


"Everything has been figured out, except how to live."
Jean-Paul Sartre (1905 - 1980)

What is the meaning of life?

Do you have an answer?

Is there any meaning at all?

Perhaps the answer is what Robert Frost hints at in his poem "The Road Not Taken"

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I-
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

- Robert Frost, From Mountain Interval, 1920.
This work is in the public domain in
the United States because it was published
before January 1, 1924.



1. Weltanschauung (World View)

Before answering (or attempting to answer) the question 'what is the meaning of life?', first you must understand the world as you see it. As a precursor to the concept take this short quiz to determine your worldview?  Please do this on your own and return with a full definition (will be on your quiz results page) and a full explanation of whether you agree with the result (in your own notes).

No doubt you have been in a conversation where someone has asked for your perspective on matters. Have you ever wondered why?

Implied within the invitation is a philosophical concept called weltanschauung. This is a German term that translates to 'worldview'. In other words, you were asked for your opinion not only because you are seen to have the (or an) answer, but also because they consciously or subconsciously know that no two people will provide the exact same answer (assuming the answer is explored).

Your worldview consists of your combined experiences, genetics and demography. In short, it is a built in, ever expanding, filter through which you view, assess and interact with the world. Some philosophers have suggested that how you interpret and interact with the world becomes a schema (a set of actions that are almost unconscious). Perhaps this is why people become 'set in their ways' as they get older...






Famed linguist, social activist and philosopher Noam Chomsky developed the
Propaganda Model whereby the media itself was said to have a weltanschauung.


Basically, the media filters stories to the public based upon:
  1. Ownership of the medium
  2. The medium's funding sources
  3. Sourcing (where information comes from)
  4. Flak (negative feedback)
  5. Norms (societal acceptance)
Do you believe these filters function in modern media? If so, what impact would that have on your worldview?
 If you want to learn more about the media and its role in your world today, click here to watch an online "Frontline" episode entitled "News War". This link provides a fascinating study of the political, cultural, legal, and economic forces challenging the news media today and how the press has reacted in turn. Through interviews with key figures in print, broadcast and electronic media over 40 years, the recent history of American journalism is traced to illustrate the challenges and influences facing the press in its delivery of the news.

 Required Reading
Click here to read a story by Antoine De Saint-exupery titled The Little Prince. One the world's 50 top selling books, this cleverly crafted philosophical exploration disguises itself as a children's story. Yet, contained within, is a thorough and engaging examination of the worldview concept. After reading this story, take the time to consider these questions:

What does this story tell us about worldview?

Whose worldview is correct?  Have a look at this Ted Talk on our perceptions....of ourselves and of others.

Can such a question be answered?


2. To Ask or Not to Ask?


That is the question...at least for philosophers. The debate as to whether the question 'what is the meaning of life' is a worthwhile one has raged for centuries. For many philosophers, the question is pointless since it either:

a) has no discernible answer or 

b) is entirely subjective and thus one person's view does not provide the answer to another person's experience. 

Likewise, often (but not always) this question relates back to God's existence that obviously carries with it a host of other concerns.

Yet, the question continues to be asked... which in itself is not surprising. After all, think back to your childhood; wasn't one of the first and foremost questions you asked 'why'?  Even Socrates demonstrated to us "the unexamined life is not worth living."

Needless to say, philosophically valid or not, the question 'what is the meaning of life?' will continue to be considered.



3. Humanism

One attempt to answer the meaning of life is fairly recent in world history (1933) titled, 'Humanism'. Paraphrased, humanism's goals mirror George Eliot's worldview: "What do we live for, if it is not to make life less difficult for each other?"

The guiding philosophy of humanism to answer the question, 'What is the meaning of life?' is a code of sorts that invites, but does not proscribe, people to live a life of meaning. In other words, you are responsible for deciding the most appropriate answer to that question.
Click here to read a copy of the Humanist Manifesto III. Do you agree or disagree with the manifesto's message? Why?

4. Does It Matter?

Nihilists argue that there is no point to life. So too did Shakespeare's Macbeth when he lamented:
"To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow; a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing."

William Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act V, Scene V.


Yet as depressing as that may sound, some philosophers have argued that the absence of a meaning or purpose to life permits people to live freely and unfettered. Without the pressure to adhere to a possibly unachievable ultimatum, people are able to create their lives' purposes rather than adhere to them.
What do you think?

 "God is Dead."  Friedrich Nietzsche, from "Parable of the Madman", The Gay Science (1882, 1887); Walter Kaufmann ed. (New York: Vintage, 1974), pp.181-82.

Nietzsche stated that:

"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. 

How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? 

What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? 

What water is there for us to clean ourselves? 

What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent?

Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? 

Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?"



Conduct a thought experiment using Nietzsche's quote as a starting point. 

Do you agree with what he says? 

What would the world Nietzsche introduces be like? Why?

Resources Icon Resources

  1. Official Noam Chomsky site - Audio and Video
  2. Humanist Association of Canada

Thursday, February 20, 2014

DAY 13, Feb 20 - More Theories on the Supreme Being


"If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank."
Woody Allen (1935 -present)

Perhaps one of Christianity's most famous depictions, Michelangelo's Genesis, has some philosophical intent?

Notice the fingers between God and Adam.  Though close, they aren't touching.

Is God destined to be just out of reach? 
.


Or is it the opposite?
Believing in God has been another philosophical hurdle for people in various cultures throughout history. Take a moment to play this game. Given its philosophical (not religious) perspective, you might be surprised by the results! Click here to go to the Battle Ground God game.


Arguments for God's Existence

In the last activity you leaned about two key arguments for God's existence, namely Cosmological and Ontological. In this activity, you will examine the remaining two:
ArgumentPhilosopher(s)
CosmologicalPlato and Aristotle
OntologicalSt. Anselm
TeleologicalThomas Aquinas
Mind-BodyDescartes, Spinoza, Leibniz


3. Teleological

Can you conceive of God as a watchmaker?
If you can, then you already understand the essence of the teleological argument. That is, imagine this scenario:

You are walking in a pristine forest when suddenly you come across an elegant pocket watch. Given its detail and intricacy, would you ever doubt that someone made it?

The Watchmaker argument follows the same reasoning:
the universe is so complex that it requires a 'maker' in order to make sense of its own existence. In other words, there is no way that the universe could have been created by chance and not design.






Or is it the opposite?

Believing in God has been another philosophical hurdle for people in 



Thomas Aquinas explained the idea in his Summa Theologica:

"The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore, some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God."(The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas Second and Revised Edition, 1920)

Scientific View
The teleological argument also receives some scientific support. Systematically, scientists have found that the universe is more complex than they initial hypothesized. Whether this complexity comes from dark energy or singularities, the fact remains that no scientific theory yet has an explanation for how the universe came into existence. In fact, due to the way the universe formed, no matter how powerful our telescopes become, humans will never be able to peer into the universe's first moments. Indeed, even Einstein argued for God's existence.


A star's inner shell
Likewise, you yourself are a part of the universe - star stuff. That is, the atoms in your body were created (could only be created) and released upon the supernova exposition of dying stars. In a very literal sense, these explosions seeded the universe with the atoms necessary for life to develop and planets to form. In other words, every part of your body originated in a star.

Talk about recycling!
Anthropic Principle


A six-story card castle made from playing cards
Almost daily you hear how fragile our world's environment is. But have you ever wondered about the universe's stability?

The anthropic principle argues that humanity's existence is so unlikely, that our being here suggests a creator. Like a deck of cards, if one single piece is removed or changed, the entire structure falls to pieces.

For example, conditions for something as fundamental as the atom depend on a balance of forces to within one in 1018. And without atoms, no physical matter could exist.
Counterarguments
Q.  As a critical thinker, can you spot any problems with Aquinas and/or others' arguments stated above in explaining the existence of God?
A.  After pondering the question, click here for some examples that help answer the question.



4. Mind-Body Problem



Descartes' illustration of the mind body problem
As you learned previously, philosophers disagree as to how and whether the mind and body interact. After all, when you think about it, how can they (unless you believed in idealism or materialism) since the images you "see" are mere representations decoded and sent electrically from your eyes to your brain? And what about insects and animals perceiving the same thing differently?

Since this perceptual filter always exists, how is it ever possible to REALLY know something for certain?
Well, one answer is God. Basically, God acts as a conduit through which the mind and body can interact... the invisible glue that bonds them together. Since the mind and body seem to exist, it only makes sense (within this argument) that something must be causing the two to interact. This argument is extensively explored by Leibniz in his "Monadology" as highlighted in the previous Activity - Is There a God Part 1.
Another variation came from Spinoza, who argued that everything is God (he called it Substance), and so there is no mind-body problem since they are both aspects of the same thing. This, in turn, means that everything from you to the glaciers are simply aspects (or attributes) of God.

Counterarguments
Q.  As a critical thinker, can you spot any problems with Leibniz and Spinoza's arguments in explaining the existence of God?
A.  After pondering the question, click here for some examples that help answer the question.

 

Some Helpful Resources

  1. Teleological Argument
  2. Anthropic Principle
  3. Condensed Monadology